CEO Letter
2010 was a year of stronger than expected financial recovery in the Club.
Your web browser does not support features needed by the web version of the report.
2010 was a year of stronger than expected financial recovery in the Club.
Despite significant volatility during the year, bond and equity markets generally yielded returns at or above expectations.
Total change in solvency capital in 2010 was 49.825 mill USD.
The dramatic landscape of Iceland is somewhat a metaphor of our volatile and cyclic industry.
2010 was a year of stronger than expected financial recovery in the Club.
The efforts of diversifying the insurance portfolio paid off better than expected. Part of the explanation can be found in a loss development, within almost all product lines, that saw lower frequency and severity of claims than we anticipated.
The other side of the equation is basically explained by a level of premium that is sustainable when looking at historical observations.
The historical observations on the claims side might however, be less indicative when we look ahead for the next couple of years. There are several indicators that seem to point in the direction of a more favorable claims environment almost across the board.
We know well from experience that this environment will not last forever.
The Club’s challenge is not only to offer sustainable prices and products that reflect the need for traditional risk transfer. The challenge is
also to offer a service platform that is world class. The added value of handling almost 1500 hull claims a year and hence an insight into the drivers of risk and how to mitigate risk, has to be transformed into lessons learned for our members and clients. These services are turned into value for our members as a superior and dedicated claims handling. Our aim, going forward, is to offer an even higher level of services simply because we expect the best practice in ship management to require this. It is expected that the “Deepwater Horizon” will be a turning point in the risk management practices within the oil and gas industry.
Furthermore, we also expect that the results of improved risk management concepts within this sector will partly cascade down to the main shipping industry. We are particularly having in mind the transportation of oil, gas and chemicals.
The Club has developed a sizable war account and along with this we have been under some pressure to deliver a service platform that can make our members better in handling the piracy
risks. We believe that the information that we are able to supply our members with, when transiting the Gulf of Aden/Indian Ocean, is of value in managing the risks.
More than ever the Club is now systematically optimizing both the product and the service platform as the dynamics of our industry dictates.
| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |
| Gross earned premiums | 149 484 | 165 512 | 171 626 | 155 414 | 173 340 |
| Gross claims | 110 166 | 170 007 | 160 462 | 122 254 | 89 136 |
| Gross result | 39 318 | -4 495 | 11 163 | 33 160 | 84 204 |
| Premiums for own account | 113 934 | 141 570 | 138 811 | 112 852 | 126 321 |
| Claims for own account | 96 211 | 150 614 | 139 249 | 101 548 | 73 557 |
| Insurance result f.o.a. | 17 724 | -9 044 | -437 | 11 304 | 52 764 |
| Other income | 4 357 | 5 422 | 6 761 | 7 300 | 10 380 |
| Operating expenses | 18 907 | 20 820 | 24 717 | 24 497 | 26 763 |
| Technical result f.o.a. | 3 174 | -24 442 | -18 394 | -5 893 | 36 380 |
| Net financial income | 25 996 | 20 343 | -25 373 | 34 288 | 13 445 |
| Total change i solvency capital | 29 169 | -4 099 | -43 767 | 28 395 | 49 825 |
| Total assets | 351 327 | 456 838 | 388 201 | 420 853 | 468 486 |
| Solvency capital + Equity | 174 908 | 175 134 | 125 961 | 160 384 | 203 303 |
| Loss ratio for own account | 84 % | 106 % | 100 % | 90 % | 58 % |
| Expense ratio | 13 % | 11 % | 13 % | 15 % | 13 % |
| Combined ratio | 97 % | 117 % | 113 % | 105 % | 71 % |
| Gross loss ratio | 74 % | 103 % | 93 % | 79 % | 51 % |
| Return on investment portfolio | 12,5 % | 10,9 % | -12,2 % | 11,8 % | 6,9 %* |
| Return on benchmark | 10,0 % | 8,0 % | -14,4 % | 17,0 % | 7,3 % |
*: From 2010 investment return is in local currency.
2010 was a good year for Norwegian Hull Club. The results from insurance activities once again improved considerably. A combination of underwriting discipline, further rebalancing of the insurance portfolio and a benign claims environment all contributed to an underwriting result significantly above expectations.
Investment activities contributed above expectations as well. Despite significant volatility during the year, bond and equity markets generally yielded returns at or above expectations. Uncertainty is still higher than normal, not least in respect of public finances in many western countries.
In sum, developments and results in 2010 are a reminder of the inherent volatility of an insurance undertaking. This year, the deviation from expectations was in the Club’s favour. However, given the significant volatility, maintaining adequate financial strength and flexibility is very important.
The result before change in equalisation provisions and tax was USD 49.8 million, which is the best result in the history of the Club. Based on the good result, the Club will pay a dividend for 2010 corresponding to 5 % of earned, mutual premium. At the end of 2010, the Club’s free reserves were USD 203.3 million. Norwegian Hull Club has satisfactory risk capacity in relation to generally applied risk measures.
Norwegian Hull Club is a marine insurer, with Hull
& Machinery related insurances as its main products. Over the last few years, the insurance business has become more diversified. The majority of the Club’s business is in the international arena, with clients spread throughout the world. The registered office is in Bergen.
Norwegian Hull Club’s business strategy is to provide integrated claims leader services and offer a diversified product mix stemming from its historical Hull & Machinery base. In the chosen market segments, the Club seeks to be a significant provider of insurance capacity and expertise, and to have a sustainable business model. The Club also strongly emphasizes the provision of supplementary services, mainly related to loss prevention activities.
It is a part of the Club’s strategy to maintain a strong capital position.
Despite major concerns following the financial crisis in 2008, volumes and rates in shipping markets have not collapsed. On the contrary, markets were probably better than expected in 2010.
The impact on marine insurance has not been negative, and may even have been positive due to less strain on operation and thereby lower claims.
The fact that the business volume in marine insurance has been upheld while claims development has been more positive than expected, has resulted in fresh capital entering marine insurance with consequences for rate levels in the market, which in general is very competitive.
In 2010, there has once again been considerable movements in currency exchange rates. Managing currency exposure is a complex issue, where the true currency exposure of some assets and liabilities may differ from their respective denominations. While a lot of attention is paid to managing currency exposure, currency fluctuations adds to the complexity and volatility of a marine insurance operation.
Management of human capital onboard ships is an important issue. The human factor is still a key cause in many claims. The introduction of the Maritime Labor Convention, expected in the second half of 2012, is a part of this issue,
and will provide both challenges and opportunities for both shipping companies and marine underwriters.
The single most significant incident in marine and energy insurance in 2010 was the blow-out on the Macondo field in the Gulf of Mexico and the subsequent loss of the drilling rig “Deepwater Horizon” and large oil spill. It is likely that the incident will turn out to be a market turning event regarding future operations and operating models, as charterers of vessels and offshore units will focus on further reducing operational risks, and because of public requirements on managing operational risks, among other things through safety exercises. Norwegian Hull Club has many years of experience in handling accidents and turning experience into useful exercises based on lessons learned. The Club will therefore further increase information and advisory activities on how to avoid accidents and build a safety culture.
At the start of 2010, the global economy and many shipping markets were weak. While aiming for a stable premium volume, Norwegian Hull Club therefore made contingencies for a decrease. In hindsight, it is pleasing to note that many shipping segments developed better than feared.
Partly for this reason, but also due to deliberate focus on developing new business, premium volume has increased during the year.
Norwegian Hull Club maintains a reinsurance programme with a panel of the financially strongest reinsurers globally, whom have extensive experience in marine insurance. There was no significant change to the panel of reinsurers nor any major events in relation to reinsurers during the year.
For Norwegian Hull Club, the most extraordinary feature of 2010 is the low claims cost. A combination of lower average claim cost, absence of large claims and a reduction in claims frequency all contributed. Almost all insurance products showed improved results from 2009 to 2010. The most significant impact on claims for own account, and thereby the year’s result, came from the lower average claims cost.
The improvement is due to a combination of favourable external factors, a restructuring of the insurance portfolio and random variation in claims. Specifically, the Club was not involved in any of the high profile losses that occured in 2010.
Going into 2010, there was more uncertainty than usual regarding the global economic outlook and its impact on financial markets. The year turned out to be volatile, with a weak first half and a strong second half. Most focus was on sovereign risk, whereas the corporate sector in general is in good shape and has performed well. Among sovereigns, the greatest focus has been on peripheral countries in Europe, but most Western countries face structural challenges that may impact their future ability to service their debt and maintain public services.
Norwegian Hull Club’s investment portfolio returned more than expected in 2010. In particular, the portfolio has benefitted from attractive yields on corporate bonds. Portfolio return was 6.9 % in local currency and 4.6 % in USD.
Solvency II is a European regulation that will govern all activities of insurance companies registered in Europe from 1.1.2013. The purpose of this new regime is to strengthen the capital position, risk management and transparency of the insurance industry, thereby increasing financial stability. Solvency II implies extensive
regulation comprising capital adequacy, risk and capital management as well as reporting and
transparency. Norwegian Hull Club has over several years taken part in tests regarding capital adequacy. The latest, and compulsory, study was carried out in the fourth quarter of 2010, and shows a comfortable margin compared to capital requirements. The Club is now well into the process of ensuring compliance with other requirements regarding organisation, systems, processes and transparency.
Norwegian Hull Club provides a wide range of services, varying from participation in officer conferences for shipping companies, to customized workshops and the facilitation of contingency drills for office staff. The purpose is to transfer experience derived from actual emergencies and claims to clients, and thereby to reduce the likelihood that new accidents happen and reduce the consequences of accidents that still happen.
Marine Benefits AS provides health insurance for seafaring personnel. The Maritime Labor
Convention, which is anticipated to come into force in the second half of 2012, is expected to contribute to increase demand for the company’s services.
Insurance Technology Solutions AS develops and operates software systems for the marine insurance industry. At the end of 2010, the company had fifteen marine insurers and brokers as clients.
Risk management is becoming increasingly important to insurance entities. The Solvency II regulation mentioned above provides the public framework for insurance operations. In addition owners, policy holders and other stakeholders have an interest in risk being managed in the best possible way.
The risk management structure, processes and systems that were established in 2008-09 were further developed in 2010. A lot of statistical data and actuarial tools are available for assessing risk in both insurance and investment operations. While these are necessary and valuable tools, there will always be events that are not fully or properly captioned in models. Therefore, sound judgement must be applied in addition
to the models, and adequate capital maintained to allow for unforeseen events and developments.
The Board of Directors has established maximum risk levels and capital targets for Norwegian Hull Club. On the operational level, an
Enterprise Risk Management Committee is established to monitor risk and propose changes to management and the Board of Directors. The Club is exposed to the following main risks:
Strategic risk relates to external and internal factors such as developments in the market and in the area of products, required personnel skills and reputation risk.
Insurance risks are the risks that the premium charged is not sufficient to cover claims being incurred and that provisions for claims already incurred are not sufficient to cover the ultimate cost. These risks are quantified based on current premium rates and historical claims data. Based on the 2010 premium level, a 10% point change in the claims ratio for own account would impact the result by USD 12.6 million. Over the last few years, claims ratios have varied by a much larger margin.
Financial risks refer to investment, credit and liquidity risks. The Club focuses both on absolute (i.e. nominal) risk and on relative risk (i.e. deviation from expected or market return). One way of measuring absolute risk is by stress- testing the portfolio. As an example, a 2% point
increase in interest rates and a simultaneous 20% decrease in equity prices and alternative investments such as real estate and hedge funds would reduce the value of the investment portfolio by USD 24.4 million.
Norwegian Hull Club has established credit lines that can be used for securing settlement of large claims. The Board considers the liquidity risk as limited.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.
Norwegian Hull Club is subject to supervision by the Norwegian Financial Services Authority. In addition, the Club’s governing bodies have
adopted separate internal regulations regarding corporate governance issues.
The mutual clients, the owners of the Club, elect members of the governing bodies. In addition, there are independent members on the Board of Directors and the Supervisory Committee.
In accordance with section 3-3 of the Norwegian Accounting Act, the annual accounts are prepared under the assumption that the
enterprise is a viable going concern. The Board of Directors and management focus on the operating result, defined as the result generated before provisions for equalization reserves and taxation but after financial items. The operating result will normally be equal to the change in free capital (equity plus equalization reserves).
The operating result for Norwegian Hull Club was USD 49.8 million (USD 28.4 million). This improvement is due to a significantly improved underwriting result.
Gross loss ratio improved from 79 % to 51 %, corresponding to a gross insurance result of USD 84.2 million. The loss ratio for own account
improved from 90 % to 58 %. This corresponds to an insurance result for own account of USD 52.8 million. The improvement in loss ratios is due to an absence of large claims, reduced average size of claims and some reduction in claims frequency. In sum, results are far better than expected based on past experience and model tools available. The technical result from insurance, exclusive of financial items and before provision for equalisation reserves, was USD 36.4 million (minus USD 5.9 million).
The result from ordinary operations was USD 11.4 million (minus USD 0.5 million).
Gross premium written was USD 189.6 million (USD 156.0 million). Premium earned for own account was USD 126.3 million (USD 112.9 million). The increase in premium income is due to a general increase in business volume.
Financial items produced a profit of USD 13.4 million (USD 34.4 million), which includes USD 4.7 million in unrealised gains on securities, and USD 3.4 million in foreign exchange loss. Administration expenses related to financial assets were USD 1.1 million (USD 3.5 million).
The main reason for the reduction in administration expenses is reduced write-down of receivables, from USD 2.0 million to USD 80 000.
Personnel, marketing and other operating expenses amounted to USD 26.8 million (USD 24.5 million).
The result was USD 8.2 million (USD 1.9 million). The Board of Directors proposes that USD 3.7 million is made as provision for dividend, and that USD 4.5 million be allocated to Other equity.
As per 31 December 2010, equity was USD 41.5 million (USD 37.0 million). In addition to equity,
the USD 161.8 million provision for risk equalisation is a general reserve that supports the various business risks.
The cash flow generated by operating activities was USD 10.6 million, while cash flow generated by investment activities in fixed assets was minus USD 12.1 million. The change in cash balance during the year was USD 8.6 million.
Norwegian Hull Club’s insurance operations are transacted predominantly in USD. The accounts are therefore booked in USD to minimise the effect of currency exchange fluctuations. The currency split of assets is managed with due consideration taken to the currency split of the Club’s liabilities.
On 28 May 2010, Standard & Poor’s confirmed its long-term counterparty credit and insurer financial strength rating for Norwegian Hull Club at “A minus”. The outlook was rated as “stable”.
At the end of 2010, Norwegian Hull Club had 92 employees. Sick leave including long-term absence equalled 1.6 % of total working hours.
The Board of Directors is satisfied with the low level of sick leave. Unplanned personnel turnover was 5.6 % (5 employees).
The gender ratio between employees at the end of 2010 was 34 % female to 66 % male. Over time, it is an objective to achieve a higher degree of gender diversity at all levels.
The Club aims to be a workplace where no discrimination occurs, in compliance with the Discrimination and Accessibility Act.
There were no accidents involving either the Club’s employees or property during the year. The working environment is considered to be good.
Day-to-day operations do not contaminate the external environment. However, the Club does insure vessels that may contribute to environmental pollution.
No member represents more than 7 % of the votes at the General Meeting. The ten largest members represent 31.9 % of the votes.
In the 2009 report, the Board of Directors expressed the view that there would be no significant growth in the coming year. This has proven correct for Hull & Machinery. Norwegian Hull Club has, however, managed to grow outside its historical base through a determined strategy of diversification of the insurance portfolio.
Going into 2011, there is a more positive outlook for global growth and not least trade, driven by developing markets. Thus business volume in traditional lines of business is expected to be upheld.
For the Club, it is significant that the insurance business is at present supported by a benign claims environment and lower repair costs. Thus, expected underwriting profitability is satisfactory. The Club will therefore seek to expand cautiously, both in traditional Hull & Machinery products when attractive opportunities arise, and in new lines of business such as offshore energy. As marine insurance is a cyclical business, such growth will always be subject to sustainability, as capital preservation and profitability will remain a priority.
The “Deepwater Horizon” disaster may turn out to be an industry changing event. Stake holders in exploration, production and transportation of oil products are likely to demand even more stringent operations. For Norwegian Hull Club, it is considered an opportunity if charterers and shipping companies demand more content in insurance and other products.
The Directors believe that the Club has developed a sustainable service platform, from which knowledge in risk management can be shared with clients.
The outlook for financial investments is uncertain, but the Club has a conservative investment strategy and cautious risk profile. Returns will be restricted by low interest rate levels. As regards equities, returns in the medium term will depend on global growth. For both bonds and equities, defaults by major countries will have significant negative impact on returns.
Norwegian Hull Club is in a strong financial position to pursue growth opportunities as mentioned. The Board of Directors do not expect profit margins to remain at the level seen in 2010, but still expects acceptable profitability in line with long term targets for the next couple of years.

The landscapes and nature of Iceland is dramatic and amazingly beautiful, and in itself a reason why we have chosen to adorn our annual report of 2010 with pictures from our Nordic neighbor. However, Iceland is also a good illustration of the volatile and harsh environment that the financial marked in general and marine insurers and Norwegian Hull Club, among them, are exposed to.
2010 is a historically good year in the almost 175 years’ story of Norwegian Hull Club. We are proud and satisfied that our strategy seems to have succeeded, but at the same time we are also humble. It is not more than two years since we experienced a very challenging year and we are well aware that fortunes can reverse quickly.
Iceland has been and is exposed to harsh environment, a cyclical (fishing) industry and volatility in financial markets. Relative to the size of it’s economy, Iceland’s banking collapse in 2008 was the largest suffered by any country in economic history. After seven quarter’s of downswing in the economy, the country experienced economic growth in the third quarter of 2010, only two years after the collapse that sent the interest rate in what had been amongst the
wealthiest and most technically developed counties in the world up to 18%. By the end of 2010 the interest is down to 3.5% and the optimism gains foothold on the Saga Island again.
The drama of Iceland’s economy is compatible with the drama of the nature. Geysers, active volcanoes, glaciers and steep escarpments. Wild sea that meets rocky coastline. It is fascinating, beautiful and dangerous. As is life at sea - the foundation of our industry. We have learnt how to show respect and be prepared. We can’t control nature and we usually fail when we try to fight it. Thus we have painfully learned.
The Icelandic nature alone was able to influence life and economy all over Europe in 2010. And this time the cause was not fishing, the industry that has played a tremendous role in the building of the Icelandic economy, but Eyafjallajökull. A volcano, that had been inactive for 200 years, demonstrated it’s power. Europe was paralyzed. Ash was in the air. Iceland showed the world we could not count them out. Iceland is still very much alive!
And Iceland is back, or at least constantly working it’s way. The Norse and Gaelic settlers that inhabited the island from AD 874 have clanged to it ever since, through heavy weather and colonial times, plagues, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, their own ice age and famine. The population of Iceland has clearly shown that they know how to rise again after a fall.
Norwegian Hull Club has also managed to rise after a challenging 2008. We are looking forward to build the Club further, but will do this while maintaining respect for an industry that is as unpredictable as nature itself.
We hope you enjoy the photos that our photographer Helge Skodvin took on his visit to Iceland earlier this year.
| Notes | 2010 | 2009 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross premiums | 17 | 189 582 743 | 156 007 898 | |
| Reinsurance premiums | 16 | -48 823 335 | -41 057 605 | |
| Change in provisions for unearned gross premiums | -16 242 528 | -593 760 | ||
| Reinsurers’ share of change in provisions | 16 | 1 804 023 | -1 504 248 | |
| A | Premiums for own account | 126 320 903 | 112 852 285 | |
| B | Allocated investment return from non technical accounts | 1 | 7 847 000 | 8 096 000 |
| C | Other insurance related income | 7 669 200 | 5 440 855 | |
| Gross paid claims | 109 219 572 | 134 874 410 | ||
| Reinsurers share of gross claims | -17 681 479 | -26 505 337 | ||
| Change in gross claims reserve | -20 083 292 | -12 620 216 | ||
| Reinsurers’ share of change in gross claims reserve | 2 102 552 | 5 799 468 | ||
| D | Claims for own account | 13 | 73 557 352 | 101 548 325 |
| Marketing expenses | 1 | 11 399 818 | 10 791 542 | |
| Commissions earned | -2 710 304 | -1 858 852 | ||
| E | Total insurance related expenses for own account | 8 689 514 | 8 932 690 | |
| F | Other insurance related expenses | 15 363 141 | 13 705 191 | |
| G | Operating result technical accounts before change in solvency capital (A+B+C-D-E-F) | 44 227 097 | 2 202 933 | |
| Change in provisions for risk equalisation | 38 434 033 | 28 872 842 | ||
| H | Total changes in risk provisions | 14 | 38 434 033 | 28 872 842 |
| I | Operating result technical accounts (G-H) | 5 793 064 | -26 669 909 | |
| Financial income | 8 304 083 | 10 368 603 | ||
| Realised gains and losses | 5 016 116 | -9 386 230 | ||
| Adjustment investment portfolio | 4 719 244 | 29 303 389 | ||
| Realised currency gain | 2 871 192 | 7 030 835 | ||
| Unrealised currency gain | -6 300 360 | 519 536 | ||
| J | Total financial income | 14 610 274 | 37 836 133 | |
| K | Administration expenses financial assets | 1 165 140 | 3 547 805 | |
| L | Allocated investment return transferred to technical. accounts | 7 847 000 | 8 096 000 | |
| M | Result from ordinary operations (I+J-K-L) | 11 391 198 | -477 581 | |
| N | Tax expenses (income) | 10 | 3 159 450 | -2 330 276 |
| O | TOTAL RESULT | 8 231 747 | 1 852 695 | |
| Profit for the year is distributed as follows: | ||||
| Dividend | 3 746 753 | |||
| Other equity | 4 484 994 | 1 852 695 | ||
| Total | 8 231 747 | 1 852 695 |
| ASSETS | Notes | 31.12.2010 | 31.12.2009 |
| Shares in subsidiaries | 4 | 428 126 | 391 125 |
| Other shares | 4 | 1 281 925 | 1 281 926 |
| Bonds held to maturity | 8 | 19 909 363 | 33 616 662 |
| Mortgage loans | 2 | 13 903 163 | 12 458 214 |
| Stocks and shares | 7 | 83 763 522 | 74 484 931 |
| Bonds and foreign exchange contracts | 9 | 153 735 003 | 141 328 947 |
| Financial derivatives | 9 | 2 077 880 | |
| Bank deposits investment portfolio | 1 | 6 672 756 | 16 479 973 |
| Total financial assets | 281 771 738 | 280 041 779 | |
| Reinsured proportion of gross premium provisions | 14 | 18 200 920 | 16 396 897 |
| Reinsured proportion of gross claims provision | 14 | 35 756 985 | 33 654 433 |
| Total reinsured proportion of insurance provisions | 53 957 906 | 50 051 330 | |
| Insurance related receivables | 67 849 485 | 44 874 942 | |
| Reinsurance receivables | 3 212 628 | 9 761 829 | |
| Disbursements | 23 720 263 | 17 741 957 | |
| Other receivables | 5 476 727 | 136 276 | |
| Total receivables | 100 259 103 | 72 515 004 | |
| Real estate | 03 | 1 496 675 | 978 140 |
| Equipment and fixtures | 03 | 3 244 472 | 2 345 006 |
| Cash and bank deposits | 25 129 118 | 10 040 370 | |
| Deferred tax | 10 | - | 2 307 616 |
| Total other assets | 29 870 265 | 15 671 133 | |
| Accrued interest | 2 626 858 | 2 573 904 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 468 485 869 | 420 853 150 |
| EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | Notes | 31.12.2010 | 31.12.2009 |
| Equity | 8 042 072 | 8 042 072 | |
| Administration reserve | 11 237 899 | 11 002 640 | |
| Other equity | 22 229 673 | 17 979 939 | |
| Total equity | 11, 15 | 41 509 644 | 37 024 650 |
| Unearned gross premium provision | 14 | 76 532 043 | 60 289 515 |
| Gross claims provision | 14 | 159 329 164 | 179 412 456 |
| Unearned commission provision | 14 | 1 279 671 | 994 733 |
| Total gross insurance provisions | 237 140 878 | 240 696 704 | |
| Provision for risk equalisation | 14 | 161 793 277 | 123 359 244 |
| Total risk provisions etc. | 161 793 277 | 123 359 244 | |
| Pension liability | 2 | 4 527 847 | 4 293 407 |
| Withheld payroll tax, social security etc. | 1 | 3 298 556 | 1 699 508 |
| Deferred tax | 10 | 853 303 | |
| Taxes payable | 10 | 0 | 213 227 |
| Total tax etc. payable | 8 679 706 | 6 206 142 | |
| Payables direct insurance accounts | 185 000 | 4 252 683 | |
| Payables reinsurance | 13 663 697 | 5 131 865 | |
| Payables other accounts | 5 513 668 | 4 181 862 | |
| Total payables | 19 362 366 | 13 566 409 | |
| TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | 468 485 869 | 420 853 150 |

| 2010 | 2009 | |||
| Profit of the year | 11 391 198 | -477 581 | ||
| Change in technical reserves | 30 971 632 | 11 569 068 | ||
| Net profit on sale of fixed shares | - | - | ||
| Net profit on sale of current shares / bonds | -5 016 116 | 9 386 230 | ||
| Net profit on sale of fixed assets | -13 125 | -7 127 | ||
| Change in net pension funds | 234 440 | 1 763 297 | ||
| Amounts classified as investing activities | -4 719 244 | -29 303 389 | ||
| Depreciation | 793 264 | 586 137 | ||
| Effect of changes in exchange rates | -300 360 | 519 536 | ||
| Taxes paid | - | 849 305 | ||
| Funds generated from operating activities | 27 341 687 | -5 114 526 | ||
| Funds generated from operating activities | 27 341 687 | -5 114 526 | ||
| Change in net receivables | -20 08 323 | 5 174 796 | ||
| Change in investment portfolio | 5 980 493 | 11 640 873 | ||
| Change in disbursements | -5 978 306 | -398 557 | ||
| A | A Net cash inflow / outflow from operating activities | 7 257 551 | 5 302 586 | |
| Cash generated / used by investing activities | ||||
| Proceeds from sale of fixed assets | 22 287 | |||
| Net profit on sale of fixed shares / bonds | - | - | ||
| Purchase of fixed assets | -558 036 | -558 036 | ||
| Change in mortgage loans | -1 444 948 | -2 665 544 | ||
| B | Net cash inflow / outflow from investing activities | -2 002 985 | -3 201 293 | |
| C | Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | 2 965 | -47 788 | |
| A+B+C | Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 5 281 531 | 2 053 505 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents 01.01 | 2 520 344 | 24 46 839 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents 31.12 | 31 801 875 | 26 520 344 |
The financial statements, which have been presented in compliance with the Norwegian Accounting Act and Norwegian generally accepted accounting principles in effect as of 31 December 2010, consist of the profit and loss account, balance sheet, cash flow statement and notes to the accounts.
The financial statements have been prepared based on the fundamental principles governing historical cost accounting, comparability, continued operations and congruence. Transactions are recorded at their value at the time of the transaction. Income is recognised at the time when it is earned. Costs are expensed in the same period as the income to which they relate is recognised. Costs that can not be directly related to income are expensed as incurred. Hedging and portfolio management are taken into account.
Assets related to current business activities and accounts receivable due within one year of the closing are classified as current assets. The same applies to short-term debt and accounts payable. Current assets/short-term debts are recorded at the lowest/highest of acquisition cost and fair value.
Monetary items in foreign currencies are record at fair value. Other assets are classified as fixed assets. Fixed assets are recorded at original cost, with deductions for depreciation. In the event of a decline in value, which is not temporary, a fixed asset will be subject to a write-down.
The Norwegian Hull Club uses the opportunity that is given in Norwegian accounting regulation (“Forskrift om årsregnskap m.m. for forsikringsselskaper” § 5-6) which gives the Club the option to use simplified application of international accounting standards.
According to generally accepted accounting principles there are some exemptions to common assessment and valuation principles. Comments to these exemptions follow below.
Norwegian Hull Club Group consists of Norwegian Hull Club, Insurance Technology Solutions AS and Marine Benefits AS. Norwegian Hull Club owns 100% of the latter two companies. The activity in these companies is regarded as insignificant addition to the group`s business, and has therefore not been consolidated in the accounts.
Premium and commission are recognised when earned. Insurance premiums are due for payment in advance and provisions are made for the unearned portion of the premiums related to a period after the end of the fiscal year (premium reserve). Premium is recorded net of commission. The insurance contracts that the Club issues are defined in line with Norwegian accounting regulation (“Forskrift om årsregnskap m.m. for forsikringsselskaper”).
Norwegian Hull Club has written multi-year policies. The premium for the insurance years 2011 and later is not recorded in the accounts.
Claims are expensed as incurred. Other costs are expensed in the same period as the income to which they relate is recognised. Claims reserves are intended to cover anticipated future claims payments for losses incurred but not yet settled at the end of the fiscal year.
These reserves comprise provisions for losses reported to the Club but not yet settled and provisions for losses incurred but not yet reported at the end of the fiscal year. Provisions for known losses are assessed individually by the claims departments, while provisions for unknown losses are based on the Club`s empirical data and future expectations as well as actuarial methods. Claims reserves are recorded after the deduction of received and/or expected cover under reinsurance agreements. Reinsurance contracts do not free the ceding Club from its obligations to the insured.
The premium reserve and claims reserve are intended to cover anticipated future claims payments. The provision for risk equalisation is intended to provide a cushion to absorb the Club`s finances against unforeseen increases in claims, and represents part of the Club`s capital together with it`s equity and the other provisions described below.
Up to and including 2007 the administration provision covered administration costs if the Club ceases operations. In line with new regulations, the provision has been reclassified to equity.
Receivables are accounted for at face value with deductions for expected loss.
Employee loans are accounted for at face value with deductions for expected loss. At year end, no deductions have been made.
Fixed assets are recorded in the accounts at original cost, with deductions for accumulated depreciation and write-down. If the fair value of a fixed asset is lower than book value, and the decline is not temporary, the fixed asset will be written down to fair value. Ordinary depreciation is made in accordance with the reducing balance principle. Upgrading of leased office premises is depreciated over the lease period. Depreciation is classified as operating costs.
The reserve for claims incurred but not reported is calculated according to the ”The Incremental Loss Ratio Method”, with insured value as the measure of exposure. The method generates reserves based on the Club’s loss triangles and changes in written insured value.
Marketing expenses do not include any sales commissions.
Norwegian Hull Club operates in the ocean marine line of business.
USD is the Club`s functional currency and the figures are presented in USD, which is the Club`s presentation currency. The Club uses USD for internal financial reporting. The major part of the Club`s premium income and the Club`s claim cost are in USD. The currency is also significant in respect of provisions in the marine ocean line of business. Profit and loss transactions in foreign currencies are translated into USD at the exchange rate on the transaction date. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the income statement.
Receivables and liabilities (including technical insurance obligations) in foreign currency are translated into USD at the year-end exchange rate. Foreign exchange gains and losses that relate to payables, receivables and cash and cash equivalents are presented in the profit and loss account under financial item as unrealized currency gain/loss. All other foreign exchange gains and losses are posted in the profit and loss account under items they relate to foreign securities and financial instruments are valued in USD at the year-end exchange rate.
Norwegian kroner are used in the official Norwegian regulatory reporting. The year end exchange rate used for the Balance sheet for the Norwegian financial reporting was 5.86(NOK/USD). The average exchange rate used in the profit and loss account was 6.05(NOK/USD).
Cash and bank deposits are included in cash and cash equivalents in the cash flow statement. The working capital credit facility amounts to USD 1.7 million, and is not used at year end. In addition, Norwegian Hull Club has another credit facility of USD 60 million covering both bank guarantees and ordinary credits. Restricted deposit amounts to USD 2.02 million at the end of the year.
Norwegian Hull Club uses the opportunity that is given insurance companies (Annual account regulation § 3-3 and IAS 39, Item 9) to review all financial assets at fair value over the result in accordance with the fair value option, if not before investment in a financial asset is decided otherwise. For Norwegian Hull Club this applies to bonds which are classified as hold-to-maturity. This means that the fair value adjustments on financial assets are taken to income before other income components.
Norwegian Hull Club will also use the opportunity to review all financial assets at fair value over the result in accordance with the fair value option for financial assets that are acquired before the transition to using the assessment rules contained in IAS 39, which follows the changes in the financial statements Regulations 4 April 2008. The application of fair value option on the basis of any transitional rule, also includes all financial assets as stated in the restated comparative figures even though these had to be discontinued today. Therefore financial instruments are valued at fair market value. Such financial instruments are equities (both listed and unlisted), bonds, hedge funds, real estate funds and money market funds.
Foreign exchange contracts are valued at fair market value as well. Bonds classified as hold to maturity are valued at amortised cost.
Financial assets are accounted for on the transaction date. Realized gains/losses on financial instruments are presented on a separate line at fair value through profit or loss. Interest and dividends income are included in finance income for financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Shares in subsidiaries and associated companies are valued using the cost method in the Norwegian Hull Club accounts. Cost increases when the parent gives the subsidiary increased equity capital by subscription for share issue or group contribution. Dividends/group contribution received is normally recognized as income, but only to the extent that dividends / group contribution received from subsidiary does not exceed the share of retained earnings in the subsidiaries after the purchase. Received dividends/group contributions in excess of this amount are recorded as a reduction of the acquisition cost. Norwegian Hull Club records received dividend/group contributions the same year as the subsidiary makes the provisions.
The Club has a pension plan that entitles its members to defined future benefits, called defined benefit plans. The calculation of the benefits are based on straight line enumeration, taking into account assumptions regarding the number of years of employment, discount rate, future return on plan assets, future changes in salaries and pensions, the size of defined benefit contributions from the government and actuarial assumptions regarding mortality, voluntary retirement and so on. Plan assets are stated at fair market values. Net pension liability comprises the gross pension liability less the fair value of plan assets. Net pension liabilities from underfunded pension plans are included in the balance sheet as long-term interest free debt, while overfunded plans are included as long-term interest free receivables, if it is likely that the overfunding can be utilised. The defined benefit plan was closed for new employees from 1 January 2006. From this date new employees are covered by a defined contribution plan.
Net pension cost, which consists of gross pension cost, less estimated return on plan assets adjusted for the impact of changes in estimates and pension plans, is classified as an operating cost, and is presented under the item payroll and related cost.
Deferred tax is calculated based on temporary differences between book values and tax basis for assets and liabilities at year-end. For the purpose of calculating deferred tax, nominal tax rates are used. Taxable and deductible temporary differences are offset to the extent they reverse within the same time frame. However, deferred tax liabilities on net pension assets are treated separately. Temporary differences that will constitute a future tax deduction give rise to a deferred tax asset. Change in deferred tax liability and deferred tax asset, together with taxes payable for the fiscal year adjusted for errors in previous year’s tax calculations constitutes tax expenses for the year.
The allocated return on investments is calculated on the basis of the average of total technical reserves during the year using the average yield on Norwegian government bonds with three years duration. Allocated return on investments is transferred from the non-technical to the technical account. In 2010 the allocated return on investments was 2.46%
| Number of employees | NHC |
|---|---|
| 31.12.09 | 89 |
| 31.12.10 | 92 |
| Benefits | Managing Director | Board of Directors | Committee | Supervisory committee | Election committee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary | 441 942 | ||||
| Other benefits | 22 600 | 177 411 | 27 046 | 23 159 | 8 933 |
The Managing Director has a loan of USD 710 596, including an interest free loan of USD 276 041. The loan is secured by real-estate collateral. Managing Director is entitled to a share of yearly profit, based on the same criteria as the profit sharing plan applicable to other employees. The Club has extended ordinary loans to employees totalling USD 10 849 003. The real-estate loans have repayment period of 20 years. Interest rates equal the lowest rate allowable if the loans are not to be taxed as employee benefit. All real-estate loans are secured by real-estate collateral.
No loss from employee loans is expected. Therefore, no provisions have been made.
Note 2 continues on next page
The audit fee for 2010 was USD 133 397. Tax advice fee amounted to USD 23 987 and the fee for other services provided by the auditor was USD 23 407.
The Club has set up a defined benefit plan with a life insurance company to provide pension benefits for its employees. The plan provides entitlement to benefits based on future service from the commencement date of the plan. These benefits are principally dependent on an employee’s pension qualifying period, salary at retirement age and the size of benefits from the National Insurance Plan. Full retirement pension will amount to approximately 66% of the plan pension-qualifying income (limited to 12G). The plan also includes entitlement to disability, spouses and children’s pensions. The retirement age under the plan is aged 67 years. The defined benefit plan was closed for new employees from 1 January 2006. From this date new employees are covered by a defined contribution plan.
The Club may at any time make alterations to the terms and conditions of the pension plan and undertake that they will inform the employees of any such changes. The benefits accruing under the plan are funded obligations.
The Club also has pension obligations for employees with salaries exceeding 12G. The funded plan was closed with effect from 1 January 2007, and replaced by an unfunded plan covered from operations. The Club also has an early retirement pension agreement with employees, from 65 years. These are non-funded obligations. Additionally the Club has pension obligations for some pensioners. These are non-funded obligations.
All pension plans are calculated in accordance with the Norwegian GAAP (NRS 6). Changes in the pension obligations as a result of changed actuarial assumptions and variations between actual and anticipated return on pension funds, will be entered on the average remaining earnings period according to the “corridor” regulations. The Club has pension plans that cover a total of 82 employees and 27 pensioners.
Note 2 continues on next page
| Asset allocation in Vital Forsikring ASA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.12.07 | 31.12.08 | 31.12.09 | 30.09.10 | |
| Equities | 24,8 % | 3,8 % | 13,5 % | 17,20 % |
| Bonds | 49,2 % | 58,7 % | 59,0 % | 49,10 % |
| Money market | 10,4 % | 20,7 % | 10,9 % | 16,90 % |
| Real estate | 15,6 % | 16,8 % | 16,6 % | 16,80 % |
| Investment return in Vital Forsikring ASA | ||||
| 31.12.07 | 31.12.08 | 31.12.09 | 30.09.10 | |
| 9,5 % | 0,3 % | 5,5 % | 3,7 % | |
| Net pension cost | 2010 | 2009 | ||
| Service cost | 1 085 367 | 1 418 221 | ||
| Interest cost | 1 062 678 | 1 289 141 | ||
| Estimated return on plan assets | -761 459 | -884 055 | ||
| Social Security Tax | 195 509 | 257 086 | ||
| Cost of administration | 94 792 | 76 986 | ||
| Amortisation of past service cost | -150 185 | -275 411 | ||
| Amortisation of actuarial losses/gains | 338 050 | 576 936 | ||
| Net pension cost | 1 864 751 | 2 458 905 | ||
| Change in Projected Benefit Obligation | ||||
| (funded obligations) | 2010 | 2009 | ||
| Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) | 18 919 076 | 14 367 234 | ||
| Market value of plan assets | -14 820 306 | -14 211 606 | ||
| Social Security Tax | 577 927 | 21 944 | ||
| Unrecognised past service cost | - | - | ||
| Unrecognised actuarial loss/gain | -4 442 775 | 805 744 | ||
| Net obligation | 233 921 | 983 317 | ||
| Change in Projected Benefit Obligation | ||||
| (unfunded obligations) | 2010 | 2009 | ||
| Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) | 9 228 418 | 5 730 891 | ||
| Market value of plan assets | - | - | ||
| Social Security Tax | 1 301 207 | 808 056 | ||
| Unrecognised past service cost | - | - | ||
| Unrecognised actuarial loss/gain | -6 235 699 | -3 228 856 | ||
| Net obligation | 4 293 926 | 3 310 091 | ||
| Financial assumptions | 31.12.10 | 30.09.09 | ||
| Discount rate | 3,80 % | 5,40 % | ||
| Rate of salary increase | 4,00 % | 4,25 % | ||
| Rate of pension increase | 0 % / 3,75 % | 0 %/4,00 % | ||
| Increase of National | ||||
| Insurance Basic Amount (G) | 3,75 % | 4,00 % | ||
| Estimated return on plan assets | 4,60 % | 900,00 % | ||
| Actuarial assumptions | ||||
| Resignation rate (over/under 40 years) | 0-8 % | 0-8 % | ||
| Contractual Pension Scheme (AFP) probability | i.a. | n.a. | ||
| Linear earning of pension entitlements | ||||
| Tariff | K2005/KU | K2005/KU | ||
| Equipment and fixtures |
Properties | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition cost 1.1 | 8 604 757 | 978 140 | 9 582 897 |
| Additions | 1 773 158 | 518 535 | 2 291 693 |
| Disposals | -276 739 | -276 739 | |
| Scrap value | -280 767 | ||
| Acquisition cost 31.12 | 9 820 409 | 1 496 675 | 11 597 851 |
| Accumulated depreciation 1.1 | 6 110 854 | 6 110 854 | |
| Ordinary depreciation | 793 264 | 793 264 | |
| Depreciation sold assets | -47 414 | -47 414 | |
| Depreciation scrap value | -280 767 | ||
| Accumulated depreciation 31.12 | 6 575 937 | - | 6 856 704 |
| Currency adjustment | - | - | |
| Book value 31.12 | 3 244 472 | 1 496 675 | 4 741 147 |
Ordinary depreciation is made in accordance with the reducing balance principle.
Upgrading of leased office premises is depreciated over the lease period.
Depreciation is classified as operating costs.
In NHC the cost method is used for the following companies
| Company | Insurance Technology Solutions AS |
Marine Benefits AS | Olav Kyrresgt. 11 AS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business office | Bergen | Bergen | Bergen |
| Ownership share / Voting share | 100 % | 100 % | 33 % |
| Result in subsidiaries and associated companies | 1 398 | -663 817 | 291 191 |
| Book value | 343 569 | 84 556 | 1 281 925 |
| Equity | 603 942 | 701 973 | 3 195 284 |
The activity in these companies is regarded as insignificant addition to the group`s business, and has therefore not been consolidated in the accounts. The Club acquired 1750 shares in 2010 from MHG in Marine Benefits AS. The Club owns after this 100% of the shares in Marine Benefits AS. If more than 50% of the total shares in Marine Benefits AS are sold by the Club to a third party within a time period of four years, MHG(former minority shareholder) shall be entitle to 9,9% of any profit the Club derives from a sale. Subsidiaries and associated companies’ financial information has been included based on unaudited financial statements as of 31 Dec 2010.
The risk that the Club`s premium income will be insufficient to cover the estimated size and frequency of claims. The risk is managed through the use of actuary models for pricing and risk assessment and adoption of a sound underwriting strategy.
The risk that Club fails to provide sufficient funds to meet future claims. Actuaries use sophisticated models to calculate sufficient provisions.
The risk associated with the choice of reinsurance structure and its adequacy, as well as the reinsurers` ability to carry the losses. Experienced employees establish a reinsurance structure ahead of the insurance year, which is regarded as optimal for the Club on the basis of sensitivity analyses of various claims scenarios, the desired exposure of the Club`s solvency capital in the event of a major claim and opportunities for transferring risk on the basis of the historical claim picture.
The capital adequacy of reinsurers and their ability to meet their obligations are also carefully assessed.
The risk that the Club`s operational guidelines are inappropriate or that Club`s employees deviate from the guidelines. A set of guidelines have been established to manage the operational risk. The Club defines critical risks, and establishes procedures to eliminate or reduce the risk. Estimated loss from operational failures has been calculated. The Club`s capital is sufficient to cover such a provision. The operational procedures are subject to continuous monitoring and are reviewed annually by the internal auditor in connection with the assessment of the Club`s internal control.
The investment portfolio is exposed to three main categories of risks namely credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk. The Club seeks to develop an investment strategy that minimizes the potential consequences of the above listed risks for any defined risk level. Routines have been established in order to make sure that the Club at any given time are in compliance with all relevant regulations in terms of capital management, capital adequacy and so forth.
The Club reviews the investment risk continuously and formally at least once a month. Furthermore, the Club has developed stress tests in order to calculate the sensitivity and potential write down of the investment portfolio, and will make sure that the results of these tests are within the risk tolerance limits and parameters adopted by the Board.
Credit risk is the risk that the Club`s customers or counterparties to financial instruments will cause the Club financial loss by failing to honour their obligation. Theoretically, the Club’s maximum credit exposure in terms of financial assets is the aggregated balance sheet carrying amounts of financial investments. In order to reduce the credit risk, banks shall have a minimum rating of “A” (by Standard & Poor’s), and the bond portfolios shall be sufficiently diversified and have an adequate rating level from a holistic point of view.
The ocean marine line of business is characterised as a mature marked. A large share of the premium income is handled through brokers, and the business is characterized by a delay in terms of payment.
The Club have premium income from clients with a good history in terms of payment and the bad debts figures are very low. The same characteristics also apply for the reinsurance part of the business. No loss from debtors is expected. Therefore, no provisions have been made.
| Direct insurance | Reinsurance | |
|---|---|---|
| Not due | 62,13 | |
| Due in 2010 | 4,04 | 2,97 |
| Due in 2009 | 1,28 | -0,05 |
| Due before 2009 | 0,31 | 0,29 |
| In total | 67,75 | 3,21 |
*Figures are presented in million USD
The reinsurance structure is established ahead of the insurance year. The Club is liable towards insured if a reinsurer does not honour its obligations. The creditworthiness of the reinsurers is therefore a part of the decision basis in the process of placing reinsurance. In order to reduce the credit risk, the reinsurers shall have a minimum rating of “A” (by Standard & Poor’s/ AM Best).A reinsurer will only occasionally have a rating below “A”.
The figure shows the reinsurance allocation in respect of the achieved rating for the insurance year 2010.
Being a marine insurance company operating in a global business like shipping, USD is the base currency. As a result, the Club’s investment portfolio is to a large extent USD based, and the return of the portfolio is calculated in USD. However, since a portion of the Club’s income is also received in Euro and NOK, a share of the investment portfolio will be invested in before mentioned currencies. Consequently, the investment portfolio is to some extent subject to currency risk for the part of the portfolio that is not invested in USD denominated instruments.
Furthermore, the Club is also exposed to currency risk due to the fact that more or less all of the operating costs are in NOK, whereas most of the income is in USD. Currency forward contracts may be used in order to limit the negative implications of a weak USD. The Club can sell up to two years’ budget operating expenses in USD in order to cover operating expenses in NOK.
In order to limit the interest rate exposure, the part of the investment portfolio that is invested in fixed income instruments shall have a maximum average duration of six years. As at the end of 2010, the actual duration of the fixed income portfolio was 1.70 years. Thus, the value of the fixed income portfolio will increase / decrease by 1.70% if the interest rate curve moves down or up by 1.00% -point.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Club will not be able to meet obligations when due. The liquidity risk in the investment portfolio is considered to be low. Roughly two thirds of the portfolio is invested in assets that under normal circumstances are highly liquid. These are money market funds, corporate bonds and equities.
Furthermore, the duration of the hold to maturity portfolio which is approximately 7% of the investment portfolio is currently 1,4 years. The bonds in the HTM portfolio (US Government bonds and “AAA” and “AA” rated corporates) have different maturities, ranging from a couple of months to several years. Other type of investments of absolute return nature is considered to be illiquid, even though there exists secondary markets for most of them.
The liquidity strategy is adopted on the basis of the Norwegian liquidity regulation (“Forskrift om forsvarlig likviditetsstyring av 29. Juni 2007”). The Club shall over time have a working capital (as deposit in bank accounts) in the region of USD 10 million. In addition, the Club shall have established credit facilities of minimum USD 25 million. The Club has developed a scenario analysis with a list of event that have the most severe impact on the Club`s liquidity position. In order to secure a sufficient degree of liquidity in the investment portfolio, at least 15% of the portfolio shall be saleable within five days without having to impact the risk profile of the portfolio by the required sales.
The Club monitors its risk taking on a quarterly basis based on risk models developed by Standard and Poor’s and the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway. The latter includes a model developed to mirror the anticipated capital requirements under the upcoming Solvency II regulations. The models covers Market risk (i.e. investment risk and risk arising from asset/liability mismatch in terms of currency and/or interest rates), Counterparty credit risk, Underwriting risk and Operational risk. The Club has established internal targets in terms of capital in excess of the model requirements. As of 31.12.2010 the Club’s capital exceeds the S&P A-rating requirement by USD 72 million and the FSA model by USD 75 million.
* Internal capital requirement is the necessary redundancy to secure less than 10% probability of breaching requirements in 12 months.
The Clubs financial assets are summarized in the table below and shows the assets as defined in IAS 39.
| Book Value | Market Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Fair Value (Stocks, shares, bonds and other financial instrument i total) |
239 576 406 | 239 576 406 |
| Bonds hold to maturity | 19 909 364 | 20 585 192 |
| 259 485 770 | 260 161 598 |
Government bonds, corporate bonds and other financial instruments that are traded in active markets where the fair value are determined on the basis of quoted market prices at the balance sheet date, are classified on level 1 in the pricing hierarchy. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates.
If all significant inputs required to value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2. Investments listed in the following have been classified on level two in the pricing hierarchy:
If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3. Investments listed in the following have been classified on level three in the pricing hierarchy:
The Club uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique:
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Quoted active marked prices |
Valuation techniques based on observable marked data |
Valuation techniques based on not-observable marked data |
|
| Financial assets at fair value through profit og loss | 63 327 224 | 132 683 314 | 43 565 868 |
| Financial assets hold to maturity | 20 585 192 | ||
| SUM | 83 912 416 | 132 683 314 | 43 565 868 |
Hold to maturity bonds are in the valuation hierarchy valued at fair value and therefore will not match the book value on the time of reporting.
The market value of the Private Equity portfolio has changed from USD 12.2 million per. 31.12.09 to USD 18.9 million per. 31.12.10. Drawdowns in the period were USD 5.6 million, while dividends and repaid investments amounted to USD 1.0 million.
The market value of the real estate funds have changed from USD 17.4 million per 31.12.2009 to USD 24.7 million per 31.12.2010. New investment and drawdowns in the period were USD 8.6 million, while dividends and repaid investments amounted to USD 1.8 million.
| Currency | Acquisition cost | Book value | Market value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity fund | ||||
| Skagen Global II | USD | 3 185 618 | 6 810 899 | 6 810 899 |
| Skagen Kon-Tiki | NOK | 9 114 015 | 10 408 750 | 10 408 750 |
| Holberg Global | NOK | 1 649 790 | 2 179 907 | 2 179 907 |
| Nordea Pro Stable Return | EUR | 8 131 822 | 7 352 503 | 7 352 503 |
| Borea Recovery | NOK | 473 850 | 684 123 | 684 123 |
| Equity fund in total | 22 555 096 | 27 436 182 | 27 436 182 | |
| Private equity | ||||
| Storebrand International Private Equity VI | NOR | 1 316 572 | 1 342 371 | 1 342 371 |
| Nordea Private Equity II | EUR | 4 334 389 | 4 790 759 | 4 790 759 |
| Nordea Private Equity III | EUR | 2 304 419 | 2 259 254 | 2 259 254 |
| Borea Opportunity II | NOK | 595 117 | 753 290 | 753 290 |
| Partners Group Secondary 2008 | EUR | 8 151 959 | 7 931 725 | 7 931 725 |
| Sector Exspec | USD | 2 249 544 | 1 795 458 | 1 795 458 |
| Private equity in total | 18 951 999 | 18 872 857 | 18 872 857 | |
| Hedge fund | ||||
| Thames River Warrior | USD | 3 505 890 | 5 121 488 | 5 121 488 |
| Thames River Warrior S-Class | USD | 841 490 | 606 445 | 606 445 |
| Sector Healthcare | USD | 5 073 195 | 7 033 539 | 7 033 539 |
| Hedge fund in total | 9 420 574 | 12 761 472 | 12 761 472 | |
| Real estate | ||||
| Aberdeen Eiendomsfond Norge I | NOK | 11 237 712 | 12 470 627 | 12 470 627 |
| Aberdeen Eiendomsfond Asia | NOK | 4 049 320 | 2 519 256 | 2 519 256 |
| Boliginvest Tyskland | NOK | 2 997 961 | 1 947 344 | 1 947 344 |
| Pareto Eiendomsfelleskap AS | NOK | 63 848 | 68 301 | 68 301 |
| Pareto Eiendomsfelleskap IS | NOK | 4 455 901 | 4 886 060 | 4 886 060 |
| Prime Office Germany | NOK | 6 508 436 | 2 801 422 | 2 801 422 |
| Real estate in total | 29 313 177 | 24 693 011 | 24 693 011 | |
| Stocks and shares in total | 80 240 846 | 83 763 522 | 83 763 522 | |
| Risk weight |
Currency | Nominal | Acquisition cost |
Book value incl. accrued interests |
Effective yield | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate bonds | ||||||
| Government bonds | 0 % | USD | 6 100 000 | 5 979 953 | 6 060 718 | 6 416 984 |
| Finance institutions and corporate | 20%-100% | USD | 13 500 000 | 13 760 600 | 13 848 646 | 14 168 208 |
| Bonds held to maturity in total | 19 600 000 | 19 740 553 | 19 909 364 | 20 585 192 | ||
| 31.12.09 | New bonds | Bonds matured | Amort. cost (change) | Reclassification | 31.12.10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal | 33 100 000 | 13 500 000 | 19 600 000 | |||
| All currencies | ||||||
| Amort. cost | 33 224 949 | -13 942 319 | 387 720 | 19 670 350 | ||
The average duration of the portfolio is 1.4 years and the effective yield is close to 4.36%.
| Risk weight |
Currency | Nominal | Acquisition cost |
Market value/Book value incl. acc. int. |
Effective yield |
Modified duration |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate bonds | |||||||
| Government | 0 % | USD | 2 005 000 | 2 019 826 | 2 023 392 | ||
| Finance institutions and corporate | 20 % | USD | 36 017 673 | 37 393 325 | 38 405 898 | 2,57 % | 2,84 % |
| Other | 100 % | USD | 25 522 878 | 26 838 676 | 27 557 022 | ||
| Corporate bonds in total | 63 545 551 | 66 251 827 | 67 986 312 | ||||
| Investment grade bond funds | |||||||
| BlueBay Investment Grade Bond Fund | 100 % | EUR | 13 133 812 | 14 937 375 | |||
| BlueBay E,erging Markets Corp. Bond Fund | 100 % | USD | 15 252 361 | 16 450 661 | |||
| Nordea SICAV 1 US Corporate | 100 % | USD | 7 000 000 | 7 498 619 | |||
| Threadneedle Target Return Fund | 100 % | USD | 5 023 671 | 4 938 142 | |||
| Investment grade bond fund in total | 40 409 844 | 43 824 797 | |||||
| High yield bond funds | |||||||
| Thames River Capital High Income Fund | 100 % | USD | 5 110 257 | 4 643 528 | |||
| Nordea High Yield | 100 % | USD | 8 000 000 | 10 332 790 | |||
| Cavendish Opportunity Fund Ser.3 | 100 % | EUR | 3 496 250 | 4 214 140 | |||
| Cavendish Opportunity Fund Ser.4 | 100 % | EUR | 3 141 773 | 3 417 068 | |||
| High yield bond funds in total | 19 748 280 | 22 607 526 | |||||
| Money market funds | |||||||
| Holberg Likviditet II | 20 % | NOK | 17 840 976 | 19 316 369 | |||
| Money market funds in total | 17 840 976 | 19 316 369 | |||||
| Other financial instruments | |||||||
| Foreign currency exchange contracts | 0 | 1 255 230 | |||||
| Interest Rate Futures | 0 | 822 650 | |||||
| Bonds and other financial instruments in total | 144 250 926 | 155 812 884 | |||||
| Tax expense for the year | 2010 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Taxes payable | - | 271 903 |
| Tax charge previous year | -1 468 | -25 818 |
| Tax effect of used loss extraordinary tax break | 0 | -730 960 |
| Correction deferred tax previous year | 27 753 | -1 773 092 |
| Currency effect in deferred tax | 129 194 | -225 644 |
| Change in deferred tax | 3 003 972 | 42 728 |
| Total tax expense for the year | 3 159 450 | -2 440 884 |
| Specification of tax expense for the year | ||
| 28% tax on net income | 11 391 198 | - |
| Conversion effect | 101 756 | -7 251 682 |
| Earnings before tax | 11 492 954 | -7 251 682 |
| Permanent differences(due to none tax-deductible expenses) | 831 527 | 418 296 |
| Permanent differences(tax-except investment - ”fritaksmodellen”) | -1 711 344 | 5 346 494 |
| Change in temporary differences | -9 928 624 | 21 384 460 |
| Used loss carried forward | -799 846 | -18 926 485 |
| Basis taxes payable in profit and loss account | -115 333 | 971 083 |
| Group contribution | 0 | -971 083 |
| Taxable income | -115 333 | 0 |
| Taxes payable | - | 271 903 |
| Estate tax | ||
| Taxes payable | - | 271 903 |
| Taxes payable - balance sheet | ||
| Tax payable in tax expense | - | 271 903 |
| Tax effect of Group contribution | - | -271 903 |
| Taxes payable - balance sheet | - | |
|
Note 10 continues on next page |
||
| Specification of the basis for deferred tax/tax asset | 2010 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| Asset | 139 183 | -371 008 |
| Receivables | -2 015 089 | -1 941 658 |
| Pension premium | -4 527 847 | -4 293 407 |
| Profit sharing provision | -413 040 | -2 769 958 |
| Stocks and shares | 10 762 824 | 3 382 874 |
| Results from shares in partnerships | 2 155 | -1 833 522 |
| Differences in results from shares in partnerships | - | -154 735 |
| Net temporary differences | 3 948 186 | -7 981 415 |
| Loss and dividend tax compensation carried forward | -900 678 | -260 070 |
| Basis for deferred tax asset in the balance | 3 047 508 | -8 241 485 |
| Deferred tax / tax asset | 853 302 | -2 307 616 |
| Specification of tax expense for the year | ||
| 28% tax on net income | 3 218 027 | -2 030 471 |
| Correction previous years provision | 26 284 | -1 798 910 |
| Currency effect deferred tax | 161 488 | -225 644 |
| Tax effect from permanent differences | -246 349 | 1 614 141 |
| Estimated tax expence | 3 159 450 | -2 440 884 |
| Owners’ funds | Administration- reserve |
Other equity | Total equity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity as at 01.01.2010 | 8 042 072 | 11 002 640 | 17 979 939 | 37 024 650 |
| Result for the year 2010 | 0 | 8 231 747 | 8 231 747 | |
| Change in administration reserve | 235 259 | -235 259 | 0 | |
| Dividend | -3 746 753 | -3 746 753 | ||
| Equity as at 31.12.10 | 8 042 072 | 11 237 899 | 22 229 673 | 41 509 644 |
As claims leader, Norwegian Hull Club may issue guarantees to third parties on behalf of clients to cover liabilities incurred in connection with collisions, salvage scenarios or other types of third party claims. Such guarantees will be issued on 100 % basis, thereby including the liabilities of co-insurers that will counter-guarantee Norwegian Hull Club’s liability for their respective shares. The Club’s exposure under the guarantees is dependant on and limited by
| Guarantee liability regarding claims | 31.12.10 | 31.12.09 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross guarantees issued | 135 007 108 | 110 441 048 |
| Counter-guarantees from co-insurers | 84 515 584 | 64 106 819 |
| Guarantees for own account | 50 491 524 | 46 334 229 |
All guarantees relate to clients` liabilities in connection with collisions, grounding etc associated with the Club`s activities.
| 31.12.10 | 31.12.09 | |
|---|---|---|
| Gross paid claims | 109 219 572 | 134 874 410 |
| Change in outstanding gross claims reserve | -20 083 292 | -12 620 216 |
| Gross claims | 89 136 279 | 122 254 194 |
| Paid claims for own account | 91 538 092 | 108 369 074 |
| Change in outstanding claims reserve for own account | -17 980 740 | -6 820 748 |
| Claims for own account | 73 557 352 | 101 548 325 |
| Run off gain (+) / loss (-) gross | 2 719 269 | 4 449 052 |
| Run off gain (+) / loss(-) for own account | 9 312 439 | 9 122 709 |
| 31.12.10 | Min. req. | 31.12.09 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unearned gross premium provision | 76 532 043 | 76 532 043 | 60 289 515 |
| Reinsured proportion of gross premium provision | -18 200 920 | -18 200 922 | -16 396 897 |
| Unerned commission provision | 1 279 671 | 1 279 671 | 994 733 |
| Gross claims provision | 159 329 164 | 141 408 316 | 179 412 456 |
| Reinsured proportion of gross claims provision | -35 756 985 | -31 384 014 | -33 654 433 |
| Provision for risk equalisation | 161 793 277 | 56 402 556 | 123 359 244 |
| Total risk provision etc. | 344 976 250 | 226 037 651 | 314 004 618 |
| 31.12.10 | 31.12.09 | |
|---|---|---|
| Risk adjusted basis of calculation | 269 390 548 | 210 589 135 |
| Split of gross basis of calculation | ||
| -risik categori 0% | 63 013 549 | 67 424 970 |
| -risik categori 20% | 102 780 464 | 119 158 722 |
| -risik categori 35% | 13 903 163 | 12 458 214 |
| -risik categori 50% | 85 484 934 | 67 438 414 |
| -risik categori 100% | 201 225 881 | 148 677 808 |
| -off balance sheet items | 12 964 034 | 6 869 945 |
| Applicable equity | 28 019 083 | 23 994 426 |
| Equity capital adequacy ratio | 9,92 % | 11,03 % |
| Minimum requirement solvency margin | 30 765 537 | 34 266 726 |
| Solvency margin capital | 160 226 303 | 118 861 049 |
| Composition of solvency margin capital | ||
| -applicable equity | 29 454 432 | 23 994 426 |
| -from provision for risk equalisation | 130 771 872 | 94 866 623 |
| Solvency margin capital in percent of requirement | 520,8 % | 346,9 % |
| 31.12.10 | 31.12.09 | |
|---|---|---|
| Reinsurers’ share of gross premiums | 48 823 335 | 41 057 605 |
| Reinsurers’ share of change in provisions | ||
| for unearned gross premiums | -1 804 023 | 1 504 248 |
| Earned premium | 47 019 312 | 42 561 853 |
| Reinsurers’ share of gross claims | 17 681 479 | 26 505 337 |
| Reinsurers’ share of change in gross claims reserve | -2 102 552 | -5 799 468 |
| Incurred claims | 15 578 927 | 20 705 869 |
| Commissions incurred | 2 710 304 | 1 858 852 |
| Reinsurers’ result | 28 730 081 | 19 997 132 |
| 2010 | 2009 | |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 50 084 525 | 48 100 728 |
| Countries covered by the EEA agreement | 98 443 551 | 76 091 689 |
| Other countries | 41 054 668 | 31 815 482 |
| Total | 189 582 743 | 156 007 898 |
Norwegian Hull Club has a claim amounting to USD 2.3 million on Lehman Re.
Due to uncertainty, the claiwm has been written down to the best estimate.

The Supervisory Committee has supervised the Club’s activities in conformity with public regulations and its mandate as adopted by the Committee.
The Supervisory Committee held four meetings in 2010 and has satisfied itself that the Club has adhered to statutes and regulations, its Articles of Association and the resolutions of its governing bodies.
Having considered the annual report and accounts for 2010 as recommended by the Board of Directors and the auditor’s report, the Supervisory Committee recommends that the Annual Report, profit and loss account and balance sheet be adopted as the annual report and accounts for Norwegian Hull Club for 2010.
